English

How does copper die casting compare to aluminum for heat exchanger components?

Table of Contents
How Does Copper Die Casting Compare to Aluminum for Heat Exchanger Components?
Overview of Copper vs. Aluminum in Heat Exchanger Applications
Thermal Conductivity and Heat Transfer Efficiency
Mechanical Strength and Durability
Corrosion Resistance in HVAC and Automotive Environments
Weight and Cost Considerations
Application Suitability
Customer-Oriented Heat Exchanger Solutions

How Does Copper Die Casting Compare to Aluminum for Heat Exchanger Components?

Overview of Copper vs. Aluminum in Heat Exchanger Applications

Both copper and aluminum are widely used in heat exchanger components due to their excellent thermal conductivity and corrosion resistance. However, the choice between copper die casting and aluminum die casting depends on application-specific requirements such as thermal performance, weight constraints, operating environment, and cost considerations.

Thermal Conductivity and Heat Transfer Efficiency

Copper offers significantly higher thermal conductivity than aluminum, making it ideal for high-efficiency thermal systems.

Property

Copper (C11000)

Aluminum (A380)

Thermal Conductivity

390–400 W/m·K

155–170 W/m·K

Heat Transfer Efficiency

Superior

Moderate

Specific Heat Capacity

Lower

Higher

  • Copper Advantage: Faster heat dissipation, better suited for compact or high-load thermal exchangers

  • Aluminum Advantage: Sufficient for low-to-medium heat transfer systems with larger surface areas

Mechanical Strength and Durability

Copper alloys like C18200 provide greater wear resistance and maintain mechanical integrity under thermal cycling and vibration.

  • Copper: Better for pressure-loaded components (e.g., manifold blocks, internal channels)

  • Aluminum: Lighter, but more susceptible to fatigue under long-term thermal stress

Corrosion Resistance in HVAC and Automotive Environments

  • Copper: Naturally corrosion-resistant and less prone to pitting in humid, acidic, or chlorinated environments

  • Aluminum: Requires anodizing or coating for long-term resistance in harsh conditions

Copper is preferred in applications requiring exposure to glycol, salt spray, or treated water systems.

Weight and Cost Considerations

Metric

Copper

Aluminum

Density

8.96 g/cm³

2.70 g/cm³

Casting Cost

Higher

Lower

Weight

Heavier

Lightweight

  • Aluminum Advantage: Lighter, cost-effective for large-scale or mobile systems (e.g., EV battery cooling)

  • Copper Advantage: Higher material cost offset by reduced size due to better thermal efficiency

Application Suitability

Application Type

Preferred Material

Justification

Compact High-Efficiency Units

Copper

Superior thermal transfer and corrosion resistance

Lightweight Mobile Systems

Aluminum

Weight savings, sufficient thermal performance

Harsh Fluid Environments

Copper

Stable in chemically aggressive conditions

Cost-Sensitive Mass Production

Aluminum

Lower cost, acceptable thermal output

Customer-Oriented Heat Exchanger Solutions

Neway Die Casting provides material-optimized casting solutions for heat exchangers:

  1. Copper Die Casting: High-performance thermal components for HVAC and automotive systems

  2. Aluminum Die Casting: Lightweight heat exchanger housings and cooling plates

  3. Post-Machining Services: Precision channels, ports, and sealing surfaces for thermal systems

Copyright © 2025 Diecast Precision Works Ltd.All Rights Reserved.